Findings show that planet Earth is
experiencing increasing greening steadily, partly due to fertilization by
atmospheric carbon dioxide.
This point is expanded by an abstract
from “nature sustainability”, a website, through the link https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0220-7
as follows:
Satellite data show increasing leaf
area of vegetation due to direct factors (human land-use management) and
indirect factors (such as climate change, CO2 fertilization,
nitrogen deposition and recovery from natural disturbances). Among these,
climate change and CO2 fertilization effects seem to be the
dominant drivers. However, recent satellite data (2000–2017) reveal a greening
pattern that is strikingly prominent in China and India and overlaps with
croplands world-wide. China alone accounts for 25% of the global net increase
in leaf area with only 6.6% of global vegetated area. The greening in China is
from forests (42%) and croplands (32%), but in India is mostly from croplands
(82%) with minor contribution from forests (4.4%). China is engineering
ambitious programmes to conserve and expand forests with the goal of mitigating
land degradation, air pollution and climate change. Food production in China
and India has increased by over 35% since 2000 mostly owing to an increase in
harvested area through multiple cropping facilitated by fertilizer use and
surface- and/or groundwater irrigation. Our results indicate that the direct
factor is a key driver of the ‘Greening Earth’, accounting for over a third,
and probably more, of the observed net increase in green leaf area. They
highlight the need for a realistic representation of human land-use practices
in Earth system models.
How does this trend affect global
warming? Does this trend reduce global warming? Does this trend mitigate
climate change?
Climate skeptics have all along argued
that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere being attributed to global warming will
be absorbed by plants in the photosynthesis process.
So, are climate skeptics being
justified? Is the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere now justified?
This post intends tackling questions
raised hitherto.
The next section should give us a hint on how
the thoughts of climate skeptics are formed on the issue of carbon dioxide
concentration in the atmosphere.
CLIMATE SKEPTIC IDEOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION OF CO2
This section is resourced from the
website “THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE” through the link https://www.heartland.org/topics/climate-change/biological-impacts/index.html,
and the justification idea follows thus:
The productivity and growth rates
of forests, crops, and wild vegetation throughout the world have gradually
increased since the Industrial Revolution in concert with, and in response to,
the historical increase in the air’s carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration. As the
atmosphere’s CO2 concentration continues to rise, plants will likely respond by
growing more robustly and expanding their ranges.
How CO2 enrichment has affected
global food production and biospheric productivity is a matter of fact and not
opinion. The evidence is overwhelming that it has and will continue to help
plants thrive, leading to greater biodiversity, shrinking deserts, expanded
habitat for wildlife, and more food for a growing human population.
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE SPIKING
Let us turn to https://research.noaa.gov/News/ArtMID/451/ArticleID/2636/Rise-of-carbon-dioxide-unabated
to find out whether the ideology of climate skeptics as indicated in the
preceding section is holding its own in that which follows:
Atmospheric carbon dioxide measured at
Mauna Loa Observatory reached a seasonal peak of 417.1 parts per million for
2020 in May, the highest monthly reading ever recorded, scientists from NOAA
and Scripps Institution of
Oceanography at the University of California San Diego
announced today.
This year’s peak value was 2.4 parts
per million (ppm) higher than the 2019 peak of 414.7 ppm recorded in May
2019. NOAA scientists reported a May average of 417.1 ppm. Scripps scientists
reported a May average of 417.2 ppm. Monthly carbon dioxide (CO2) values
at Mauna Loa first breached the 400 ppm threshold in 2014, and are now at
levels not experienced by the atmosphere in several million years.
“Progress in emissions reductions is
not visible in the CO2 record,” said Pieter Tans, senior
scientist with NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory. ”We continue to commit our
planet - for centuries or longer - to more global heating, sea level rise, and
extreme weather events every year.” If humans were to suddenly stop emitting CO2,
it would take thousands of years for our CO2 emissions so far
to be absorbed into the Deep Ocean and atmospheric CO2 to
return to pre-industrial levels.
With the increasing greening of planet
Earth due to usage by plants one might expect a reduction in the atmospheric
content of carbon dioxide but the foregoing tells us something different.
WHY PLANTS ARE NOT COPING
Through the link https://research.noaa.gov/News/ArtMID/451/ArticleID/2636/Rise-of-carbon-dioxide-unabated
the reason is given below:
Even though terrestrial plants and the
global ocean absorb an amount of CO2 equivalent to about half
of the 40 billion tons of CO2 pollution emitted by humans each
year, the rate of CO2 increase
in the atmosphere has been steadily accelerating. In the 1960s, the annual
growth averaged about 0.8 ppm per year. It doubled to 1.6 ppm per year in the 1980s
and remained steady at 1.5 ppm per year in the 1990s. The average growth rate
again surged to 2.0 ppm per year in the 2000s, and increased to 2.4 ppm per
year during the last decade. “There is abundant and conclusive evidence that
the acceleration is caused by increased emissions,” Tans said.
Tans is a senior scientist with NOAA’s
Global Monitoring Laboratory, and had been cited in the preceding section.
HOW ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE IS MEASURED
As a follow up to the preceding
section we should know how atmospheric carbon dioxide is measured. Let the NOAA link (https://research.noaa.gov/News/ArtMID/451/ArticleID/2636/Rise-of-carbon-dioxide-unabated)
that has informed us thus far continue to inform us, and we are informed thus:
Charles David Keeling of Scripps
Oceanography, located at the University of California San Diego, began on-site
CO2 measurements at a NOAA’s weather building on Mauna Loa
in 1958, initiating what has become the longest unbroken record of CO2 measurements
in the world. NOAA measurements began in 1974, and the two research
institutions have made complementary, independent measurements ever
since.
The Mauna Loa observatory is a
benchmark sampling location for CO2. Perched on a barren volcano in
the middle of the Pacific Ocean, the observatory is ideally situated for
sampling well-mixed air - undisturbed by the influence of local pollution
sources or vegetation - that represents the global background for the northern
hemisphere. The Mauna Loa data, together with measurements from sampling
stations around the world, are incorporated into NOAA’s Global Greenhouse
Gas Reference Network, a foundational research dataset for
international climate scientists.
This tells us that the tracking and
measurement of atmospheric carbon dioxide content is a concerted,
collaborative, coordinated, scientific and synergic global effort.
A HEADWAY
If the increasing greening
(vegetation) of planet Earth is not proving to be justification for global-warming
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and contrary to the ideology of climate
skeptics, what is man to do then to address the issue of climate change?
At the virtual Leaders Summit on
Climate on April 23, 2021, hosted by United States President Joe Biden, Bill
Gates was invited to make a statement, and in his statement he proffered a
headway. That headway will be adopted as the main constituent of this section, and
it is as follows:
But climate change is an incredibly
complex issue—and using today’s technology, it will be virtually impossible to
meet our goals. The reason is that nearly all of today’s zero-carbon
technologies are more expensive than their fossil-fuel counterparts. To
provide all the benefits of the modern lifestyle to people around the
world, we need new zero-carbon products that are just as
affordable—that have what I call a Green Premium of zero.
It will be hard to create those
products, but we can do it—if we invest in innovation and build the
infrastructure for the transition to a clean economy.
This will require doing three
things at once.
First, we need to develop and deploy
breakthrough technologies that allow us
to eliminate emissions throughout the physical economy.
Second, we need to tap the
power of markets to fund and deploy these innovations— for example, by finding
creative ways to finance technologies, and by leveling the playing field so
they can compete with fossil fuels.
Third, governments and
corporations need to adopt policies that will make it faster and
cheaper to make the transition, and leaders will need to
reward those who take difficult steps.
CONCLUSION
Notwithstanding the increasing
greening of planet Earth, global warming accelerates, thus proving that
greening of planet Earth does not justify anthropogenic carbon dioxide content in
the atmosphere. Global warming accelerates because carbon dioxide, a heat-trapping
gas, increasingly and at an accelerated rate fill the atmosphere from human
activities! Climate skeptics have argued that the amount of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere today is not harmful because plants or vegetation have use for
it. There is nothing wrong with carbon dioxide in itself as an atmospheric gas,
for it is part of the gaseous structure of planet Earth, alongside nitrogen,
oxygen etc. It is the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that is the
issue. A balance in the gaseous content
of the atmosphere is therefore needed! A
headway is being proffered by Bill Gates of Microsoft. The headway is the
deployment of “breakthrough technologies” to eliminate emissions “throughout the
physical economy.”
As a matter of fact that which is being proffered is substantially nothing new. It is being done in patches in parts of the world. The critical thing now is a global unity of purpose, urgency and action!
Comments
Post a Comment